Heart1.com: Great Information, Real Community, Better Living.
 Register
 Login
 Main Page
 Heart News
Feature Story
 Education Center
Conditions
Procedures
Diagnostics
 Heart Attack Center
Prevention
Survivors
Dr. Reginald “Reggie” Washington  Heart
 Hero™

Dr. Reginald “Reggie” Washington:
Disease Prevention through Weight Management.
About Heroes
 Join the Discussion  in  Our Forums
 Community
Heart1 Forums
Patient Stories
 Reference
Online Resources
Video Library
advertisement
Search the Body1 Network
September 09, 2010  
HEART NEWS: Feature Story

  • Print this Article
  • Email this Article
  • Links/Reprints
  • Artificial Heart Plan Raises Questions

    Artificial Heart Plan Raises Questions


    April 30, 2003

    BOSTON (AP) - Officials at Abiomed Inc. said Tuesday they were considering implanting their artificial heart into patients who have suffered major heart attacks and whose relatives would have to give consent.

    Company officials have discussed the proposal with ethics experts and believe it could be done "without compromising patients' rights or patient integrity," said Edward E. Berger, the company's vice president for strategic planning and policy.

    But other experts raised questions.

    "It's such an extraordinary experiment that informed consent is absolutely essential," said George Annas, a professor of health law and bioethics at Boston University. "I really see no way you could justify this without the individual's consent."

    Abiomed has gained worldwide attention for its trial of the Abiocor, a self-contained, implantable replacement heart. The Abiocor has been implanted in 10 people since July 2001. Nine have died. The 10th is in stable condition at the Texas Heart Institute in Houston, more than two months after the operation.

    So far, the clinical trial has used patients with end-stage heart failure who have a 70 percent chance of dying within a month and no hope of other treatment.

    The company's proposal concerns people who have suffered massive heart attacks, who still have little chance of surviving, but who are otherwise healthier because they haven't been debilitated by a long-term progressive condition.

    These patients are frequently heavily sedated or being kept alive by life support.

    Berger said the company hopes it will suffice to have a previously authorized health care proxy - usually a relative - consent to the implant.

    Proxies allow a relative to make a decision about treatment for a patient unable to express his or her wishes. But it's not clear if laws on medical proxies would allow a relative to put a patient in a medical experiment.

    "I guess the question is: Is society comfortable with the notion that somebody can give their body to science while they're still alive, but are no longer conscious and aren't able to give their consent?" asked Jonathan Moreno, director of the Center for Biomedical Ethics at the University of Virginia.


    Last updated: 30-Apr-03

    Comments

  • Add Comment
  •    
    Interact on Heart1

    Discuss this topic with others.
     
    Feature Archives

    A Healthy Heart Prefers Seven Hours of Sleep

    Recommended Blood Pressure Level Differs For Heart Patients With Diabetes

    Too Much TV Contributes to Risk of Heart Attack

    Short people are more likely to develop heart disease than tall people

    Newer Infant Heart Surgery Technique Yields Better Survival In First Year Of Life

    Next 5 Features ...

    More Features ...
       
     
     
     
    Home About Us Press Jobs Advertise With Us Contact Us
    advertisement
    ©1999- 2010 Body1, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Disclaimer: The information provided within this website is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for consultation with your physician or healthcare provider. The opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of the Owners and Sponsors of this site. By using this site you agree to indemnify, and hold the Owners and Sponsors harmless, from any disputes arising from content posted here-in.