Other Body1 Health Sites: Empower your Life
Heart1
 Register
 Login
 Main Page
 Heart News
Feature Story
 Education Center
Conditions
Procedures
Diagnostics
 Heart Attack Center
Prevention
Survivors
Dr. Reginald “Reggie” Washington  Heart
 Hero™

Dr. Reginald “Reggie” Washington:
Disease Prevention through Weight Management.
About Heroes
 Join the Discussion  in  Our Forums
 Community
Heart1 Forums
Patient Stories
 Reference
Online Resources
Video Library
advertisement
Search the Body1 Network
February 09, 2010  
HEART NEWS: Feature Story

  • Print this Article
  • Email this Article
  • Links/Reprints
  • Arthritis Drugs May Increase Heart Attack Risk


    April 19, 2002

    WASHINGTON (AP) - There's growing suspicion that switching from aspirin to a more stomach-friendly arthritis drug could increase some people's risk of heart attacks - and a study suggests the reason: a drug-caused chemical imbalance that spurs blood clots.

    The new research was in mice, not people. But the evidence is prompting scientists to study users of new painkillers called cox-2 inhibitors to determine whether their hearts are at risk.

    At issue is whether people with heart disease - not healthy people - increase their risk of heart attacks even more by taking the popular arthritis pain relievers Vioxx or Celebrex.

    The study by University of Pennsylvania researchers, in Friday's edition of the journal Science, suggests, biologically, how the drugs could cause such side effects.

    Vioxx maker Merck & Co. dismisses the study as irrelevant, because it is in mice and presumes an effect in the human body far larger than the drug actually causes.

    A leading heart expert, however, called the new research a very important step in explaining an earlier study that found certain Vioxx users suffered twice the risk of heart attacks as users of an older painkiller.

    ``Now the only thing we're really missing is quantifying the magnitude of the risk,' said Dr. Eric Topol of the Cleveland Clinic, who wants more research quickly to settle the issue.

    Meanwhile, he said, ``If you have heart disease, it ought to be with particular care and concern that you take these medications, ... because there could be some risk.'

    People's bodies harbor two forms of an enzyme that plays a role in pain-causing inflammation and blood clotting. One of the enzymes, Cox-1, makes thromboxane, which causes blood vessels to constrict and platelets to become sticky, steps important in a heart attack or stroke. The other, Cox-2, is a major source of prostacyclin, which dilates blood vessels and prevents platelets from clumping together.

    In a healthy person, the two coxes are thought to balance each other so blood doesn't excessively clot.

    In people at risk of heart attack, aspirin helps because it thins the blood by blocking cox-1; it also slightly blocks cox-2.

    Vioxx and Celebrex, in contrast, block only cox-2. Could that action let cox-1's clotting tendencies run amok? The drugs' makers long dismissed that idea, because other body chemicals also control clotting.

    Then last summer, Topol and other doctors reported more Vioxx users than users of the older painkiller naproxen suffered heart attacks. Vioxx maker Merck & Co. argued Vioxx didn't cause illness, but naproxen, like aspirin, thins the blood so naproxen users got an extra benefit.

    The new study bolsters suspicion that Vioxx could play an active role.

    In genetically engineered mice, researchers irritated an artery to spur release of both clotting chemicals. Mice resistant to prostacyclin's effects, a model of cox-2 inhibition, experienced more thromboxane-caused clotting activity.

    That's not proof people would be endangered, stressed lead scientist Dr. Garret Fitzgerald, a University of Pennsylvania pharmacologist. After all, he said, ``Mice aren't people.'

    Still, ``the credibility of the hypothesis is enhanced' enough that he plans to begin studies in people to try to settle the issue.

    But the study looked at mice that had completely inhibited prostacyclin, while cox-2 drugs inhibit the chemical only half as much, said Merck scientist Dr. Alise Reicin.

    She said the study contributed no new information to the debate, but Merck plans further safety studies to deal with the issue, although she would not provide details.

    Settling the issue is crucial because millions use cox-2 inhibitors. That means, Topol said, that even if the risk is very small, it could result in lots of heart attacks.

    Last updated: 19-Apr-02

    Comments

  • Add Comment
  •    
    Interact on Heart1

    Discuss this topic with others.
     
    Feature Archives

    Go Red for the American Heart Association’s Fight Against Heart Disease

    New Studies Challenge FDA Heart Device Regulations

    Tests for Assessing Cardiovascular Health- Considerations for People with Diabetes

    Occasional Smokers Face Real Risks

    Bone Marrow for Broken Hearts

    Next 5 Features ...

    More Features ...
       
     
    Related Multimedia

    The risk of cardiac death due to a lower ejection fraction

    Plags/fatty deposits as a cause for a heart attack

    Arthroscopic Surgery of the Knee & Shoulder

    More Features ...
     
    Related Content
    Arthritis Drugs May Have Dangerous Side Effects

    FDA Orders New Vioxx Labeling

    Pfizer's Celebrex Study Shows Heart-Attack Risk

    Welcome Back: FDA Panel Recommends Celebrex, Vioxx and Bextra

    Arthritis Medication VIOXX Pulled from Market

    More Features ...
     
    Home About Us Press Jobs Advertise With Us Contact Us
    advertisement
    ©1999- 2010 Body1, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Disclaimer: The information provided within this website is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for consultation with your physician or healthcare provider. The opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of the Owners and Sponsors of this site. By using this site you agree to indemnify, and hold the Owners and Sponsors harmless, from any disputes arising from content posted here-in.
    See our Terms of Service, our Privacy Policy, our Advertising Policy and our Editorial Policy.