Other Body1 KnowCo's: Empower your Life™
Back1 Body1 Dental1 Diabetes1 Fibroids1 Knee1 MedTech1 Reflux1 Shoulder1 Uterus1 Veins1 Wounds1
Body1
 Register
 Login
 Main Page
 Heart News
Feature Story
 Education Center
Conditions
Procedures
Diagnostics
 Heart Attack Center
Prevention
Survivors
Dr. Juerg Schmidli  Heart
 Hero™

Dr. Juerg Schmidli:
Revolutionizing Blood Pressure Care.
About Heroes
 Join the Discussion  in  Our Forums
 Community
Heart1 Forums
Patient Stories
 Reference
Online Resources
Video Library
advertisement
advertisement
Search the Body1 Network
   
October 11, 2008  
HEART NEWS: Feature Story

  • Print this Article
  • Email this Article
  • Links/Reprints
  • Manufacturer Argues Against Ephedra Ban

    Manufacturer Argues Against Ephedra Ban


    April 12, 2004

    NEWARK, N.J. (AP) - The manufacturer of a popular diet supplement containing ephedra urged a judge to block a nationwide ban on the herbal stimulant that was taking effect Monday, arguing that there is no proof it is dangerous if used properly.

    The herbal stimulant, once hugely popular for weight loss and bodybuilding, has been linked to 155 deaths and dozens more heart attacks and strokes.

    In a lawsuit filed last month, lawyers for NVE Pharmaceuticals Inc. of Newton, manufacturer of the supplement Stacker 2, asked for a temporary restraining order blocking the ban on ephedra pending further scientific tests. U.S. District Judge Joel Pisano was to hold a hearing on the request Monday morning.

    After years of fighting manufacturers over ephedra's risks, the Food and Drug Administration announced in December that it was banning sales of the amphetamine-like herb - the first such ban of a dietary supplement. The ban takes effect Monday.

    Research shows the herb can speed heart rate and constrict blood vessels even in seemingly healthy people, but it's particularly risky for those with heart disease or high blood pressure or who engage in strenuous exercise.

    Unlike medications, which must be proven safe and effective before they're allowed to be sold, federal law allows dietary supplements to be marketed without any such proof. To curb a supplement, the law requires the FDA to show it poses a significant health threat.

    NVE Pharmaceuticals maintains that the FDA lacks proof that ephedra is dangerous if used as directed, and its lawsuit argues that the agency simply reacted to the emotion of high-profile deaths like Baltimore Orioles pitcher Steve Bechler.

    The FDA argued that it amassed sufficient proof of ephedra's dangers from thousands of side-effect reports and scientific studies that proved the herb's stimulant-like effects.

    Ephedra sales already had plummeted because of publicity about the risks, which peaked after Bechler's ephedra-related death a year ago. Three states - New York, Illinois and California - prohibited the stimulant on their own.


    Last updated: 12-Apr-04

    Comments

  • Add Comment
  •    
    Interact on Heart1

    Discuss this topic with others.
     
    Feature Archives

    Bone Marrow for Broken Hearts

    The Silent Destroyer – Part Four

    Diabetes and Joint Surgery Increases Heart Risk

    The Silent Destroyer: Part Three

    Screening For Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

    Next 5 Features ...

    More Features ...
       
     
    Related Multimedia

    Plags/fatty deposits as a cause for a heart attack

    The risk of cardiac death due to a lower ejection fraction

    The function of a defibrillator

    More Features ...
     
    Related Content
    Ban on Stimulant Ephedra to Begin

    FDA About to Finalize Ephedra Ban

    Ephedra Merits FDA Warning

    Investigators Question Ephedra Complaints

    GNC Says It Will Stop Selling Ephedra

    More Features ...
     
    Home About Us Press Jobs Advertise With Us Contact Us
    advertisement
    ©1999- 2008 Body1, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Disclaimer: The information provided within this website is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for consultation with your physician or healthcare provider. The opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of the Owners and Sponsors of this site. By using this site you agree to indemnify, and hold the Owners and Sponsors harmless, from any disputes arising from content posted here-in.
    See our Terms of Service, our Privacy Policy, our Advertising Policy and our Editorial Policy.